tripartite means two love making worshippers at the base points
and the God.dess, of love, at the apex. It is like a triangle
contract of making love as whoreship between two believers,
foldmates, of whom you can have many in parallel as opposed to
dualistic duelistic relationships in series or the outmoded
discredited marriage, mar/rage, idea. It is like a contract but
you can never truly have a contract with God. The arrangement
between the two base believers is an understanding rather than a
relationship and unlike a generally in series relationship need
never end with a crunch or fade out or loss of a friend. Believers
who have multiple arrangements in parallel can be said to have
parallationships, time permitting.
The sexual sacraments are generally
intercourse or oral sex m>f or f > m the way it used to be
in the Goddess of Love, Ashtoreth, Astarte, Artemis, Venus, Diana,
etc religions in the middle east a few thousand years ago which
whoreshipped, by way of sex, the female side of the deity which
got replaced with innocuous bread and wine by more watered down
but manipulative unscriptural women-as-pawns-in-deals systems
seeking to distance themselves from naked all out love worship.
Remember Jesus did offer one woman living water and the breaking
of the bread, the breaking of the body, referred to orgasm
stemming from the original sacrament understandings and Jesus and
Mary M never did particularly advocate marriage.
We need to junk cardboard crap money and
control religions and go back to natural slut (spiritual leader
unto truth) religion for what our ever loving organs are designed
by God for. If we are intellectually honest we all want it. Nobody
is made to be only attracted to just one in 3.5 billion people.
Such a person who says that is a liar. It is our birthright to
have as many who like us as we want and have time for and for this
reason we are born and for this reason we exist – to make those
we like who like us happy and whoreship God that we be turned on
sexually ever more ever more with ever more. At the moment, things
being new, believing girl and guys who have thought things through
are a bit thin on the ground but once things take off things will
turn around. At the moment believers should evaginalize and
outreach by whoreshipful seduction into their white circles.
designed, created and equipped refers to girl / guy believers
being born to have sex as whoreship with any other mutually
responsive believer, which any intellectually honest untrammeled
believer wants to do with other agreeable mature believers who
know their religion, the original Magdelenian Christianity that
got shoved aside by the Peter model, as a primary reason for
existence rather than say having a job or just dating over endless
cups of coffee or wasting time with gold diggers.
organs, our operations section, are primed to be firing away all
the time for whoreshipping, evaginalizing and orgasming in OMG
praise, not just for the very very occasional baby.
and commanded pertain to scriptural references e.g.
- love one
another, not one other, and
- presenting your body as a living
sacrifice, in love, and
- having been bought with a price
glorify God in your body, which means intercourse as worship,
masturbation as meditation, orgying, love orgying as
- forsake not the coming of yourselves
together as is the custom of some comforting one another all the
more until the day comes
- where two or three come together in
my name there am I in the midst of them
- that their hearts may
be encouraged, being knit together, point and loop, in love and
so whether you eat or drink or whatever you do (like making love
as worship as between believers), do all for the glory of God
by this shall all people know ye are my disciples if ye have love,
make love, one to another (and at the moment there are NO
Christian groups where that is happening, hence very few teaching
starved disciples at the moment.
religion which does not involve having multiple agreeable
believers, who have thought things through and have the requisite
time, as sex partners for whoreship but rather fronts for
contractual marriage using women, or men, as pawns in family and
dynastic deals on land and property does not make much sense and
religions that say sex is off limits to God and are humanistic,
boring, isolative, undoctrinal, unnatural, finite, fuddy duddy and
are even sick.
Even honest atheists would say having multiple
sex partners who are mutually responsive, unrestrained and
untrammeled is natural. Such atheists would simply deny the apex
of the triangle. An “atheist” or “humanist” who is married
pursuant to the traditional, outmoded but generally accepted as
hypocritical “churchianity” model is however a joke and not
intellectually honest, even being engaged in the tort of passing
off, and a true atheist or humanist in such an outmoded
arrangement would be obliged to divorce to gain credibility and
respectability in the eyes of their peers and any enlightened
partners. True believers and true atheists don’t get married and
true believers and true atheists have multiple foldmates.
Atheists, as said, deny the apex and mostly have only lateral sex
while believers, have three dimensional sex, being in parallel.
Non thinkers get married in stupid investment and money/asset
pooling arrangements where some 50% do their money and time and
mental health and are hoodwinked and outsmarted in the end as
gamblers in contractual traps having been sucked into believing
they only have a severely limited number of years on a rock going
around the sun.
God.dess simply refers to God being both
male and female at the same time as God is not male or female but
assumed to be both and maybe more so the “.” goes in between
God and dess. You could put a “/” there but it is not an
either / or but a both at the same time.
Delano # 527
Thank you Delano for saying the people are the
base and the apex, the zenith, is the divine. The, or any, two
people are always the relative base but a pentagon has not just a
base and an apex but two intermediary points which can represent
two intermediate spiritual points and if we take the vertical
tripartite arrangement to a vertical quinpartite arrangement then
the intermediate two points are intermediaries between human and
divine such as two facilitating angels, one each, so we also make
love with and through angels as channels, clarifiers or magnifiers
so to speak.
However for now we’ll stick to triangles.
another sense, where we move to a pentagon (5 triangles) or
octagon (8 triangles), and so on, we move ever towards a circle
which we as foldmates are encouraged to develop over eternity as
we collect unto ourselves our foldmate love whoreshippers with
whom we whoreship unto the apex, perhaps pentagonally in communion
with those who have gone before, who live in love for whom
reflected passion and transmitted orgasm from us is praise and
reality and a way of everlasting life, if you believe.
triangular tripartite arrangement is a triangle, a trinity,
ascending to the apex but as we move closer to the circle, or semi
circle, we may conceptualize intimates and divine above, the outer
circumference or the centre, as you will, and friends and
antimates below. We remain the centre of our superstructure as
those we ongoingly come together with accrete around us each with
an overall and personal apex which is the God.dess of love
overall, the centre of the spherical universe of love structure.
People could keep charts on their computers. Someone could design
a software lattice tracking program for all members to use and
someone with lots of time on their hands could track everyone’s
intersecting networks of love and lust for fun.
other hand, you could always see it as one triangle, one
tripartite vertical arrangement with a consistent apex and an ever
changing number of reciprocating base points relative to you. A
structure like a geodesic dome may be more conceivable to some
with the common apex being the centre with up to a standard set of
six foldmateships per person on the surface.
discourse example of the 8 triangles, Socrates
showed an example of a basis for an ever growing assemblage of
triangles which can be tripartite arrangements, each with apexes
but all part of a superstructure with a personal divine apex, and
so with the accretion of your foldmates moving your overall
structure more towards a circle or sphere, if you will, with an
apex overall, or within all, you have an illustration of what
Socrates, by his Socratic method, was outlining which could be
said to constitute by way of the whoreshipfoldmate system of
parallationships a geocentric social proofing for the divine.
Socrates triangle accretion structure is the basis of an ever
increasing more circular foldmate structure, (the magic circle
club) with a centre / apex, which must be there, so we have a
unique experiential space for the divine apex presence as every
such structure must have a centre common to all.
a geodesic dome where the centre is the divine and a common apex,
so to speak, to all triangles, each having two circumferential
points, any foldmate on the surface can have as many as six
foldmates and once six are completed one can, time and frequency
permitting, start on more, up to another six, at another point.
Hence the geodesic dome was fittingly designed by one aptly named
called Buck Minster Fuller, a bit of a linguistic proof.
said Socrates illustration in Plato’s dialogue Meno,
allows not only an apex but also a nadir and thus is in line with
your duality or opposition observations that is consistent with
Newton’s third law of motion that every action is met with an
equal and opposite reaction so we have God.dess at the apex and we
have an opposing entity at the nadir. Some, depending upon their
perspective, would tend to invert it but in so doing it
nevertheless tends to point again towards the two opposing
entities, apex and nadir, God.dess and devil (who for the wise is
but a wealthy prosecutor pointing you away) in tension.
this lattice structure we have the pure and holey ever loving ever
sharing beautiful angelic and honest: pure hearted high and
ascending sluts (spiritual leaders unto truth), the true
believers, the true seekers and the deceived or hurt victims
descending from the apex, in that order, and below: the impotent
uninfilled purblind fuddy duddies, acquisitive gold/ghouldiggers,
determined fools, ugly hypocrites and killjoys, rigid control
freaks and scamming deceiving diabolical roaster toasters and
assorted demons and devils, ever ready to take advantage of or
claw back the children of the light, in that order towards the
By making love and celebratory sex, i.e. Augustine’s
Just war, the joust war, the jaust war, with other true believing
spiritual sluts and affirming that love and orgasms should not be
subject to contract we move ever away from the clutches of those
towards the nadir and of course by loving others in deed not word
with a greater ongoing level of commitment in eternal honest sex
loving our neighbour we love God.dess more. And what honest person
is going to say they don’t love lots of unrestrained
significance laden sex with any believer in love and lust they
quite like who quite likes them who has come to a knowledge of the
truth and is happy to share and, being so busy with a multiplicity
of like minded lovers, has no time or quarter for jealousy?
triangle is the next evolutionary step up from the lateral
dualistic duelistic relationship between two points where God.dess
as a relative apex becomes more influential in the life of any
whoreshipper who, by so making love as whoreship ongoingly with as
many mutually responsive and reciprocating agreeable believers as
they like, their “neighbours”, comes to love God more. The
infinite circle of foldmates is the ultimate with God.dess at the
apex and the effect of the nadir becoming of lesser import with
all sane people seeking to intercourse themselves ever higher.
you see the geometry tends to add sides as we reach out or share
evermore and so move to a structure with an infinite number of
sides which is the circle or sphere, the white sex circle or
sphere and you and yours are always at a relative base point
centre of your circles and the apex common to each is a personal
divine apex, the very shared and common to all centre.
here by Socrates 8 triangle discourse we tend to have a manner of
proof of God in line with Newton’s third law of motion overall
and an answer to the evening of 23.5’s question is there a God,
do we not?
confirm from nature: the accreting Socratic triangular
parallationship structures, as on the surface of the pictured
geodesic dome, are reflected in the construction of a snowflake
which generally always has six facets. God designs every snowflake
to be different so no two snowflakes are ever the same but all
generally have six facets, six arms, six points just like any
corner point of a triangle does per the said Socratic
triangulation accretion method on the geodesic dome surface as can
be seen. Hence you have can snowflakeships where you, as a
divinely appointed snowflake centre have six snowflakeships
potentials with fold mates, snowflake mates, snowies, snaffles,
flakies, with whom you make and share love as to one another, up
to six in one flakefold, and not to just one other as in
unscriptural marriages or relationships which lead to artificial
stifling, frustration, over dependence, unhealthy confining of
energies, boredom and denial of others’ desires for you.
can have a number of sexual snowflakeships with snowmen or
snowchicks, as white as the driven snow snowflakemates,
snowdropmates, drop ins, as you have time and accept spirit filled
energy for; maybe as many as six of each making a total of 42, 6
in the inner ring, 36 in the second ring. If you spread yourself
very thin and have rarified snowflakeships where you seek to
sexually and intimately be of blessing to many you could have 6 x
36 in the third ring making a total of 6 + 36 + 216 = 258
snowflakies, all of whom have their own folds of six’s too, all
in a snowflake lattice of snowflakeships or foldmateships.
Timewise you could have one different snowmate, drop in for each
night of the week with one night off alone, unless you are are
coming together for group whoreship in threes or fours etc in
on the seventh night you could all get and come together in divine
whoreship as unto Herim.
cf Isaiah 1:18
Come now, let us reason together," says the LORD. "Though
your sins (marriage: marring and raging) are like scarlet, they
shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they
shall be like wool.
Surely you desire truth in the inner parts; you teach me wisdom in
the inmost place. Cleanse me with hyssop, and I will be clean;
wash me, and I will be whiter than snow. Let me hear joy and
gladness; let the bones you have crushed rejoice.
She is not afraid of snow for her household, for all her household
are clothed in scarlet.
Note a six sided polygon is called a
hexagon, a holy sexagon. I
throw it open to others to further refine.
All we need to do to create
Heaven on earth is to find others with whom we are mutually
responsive who, without qualms believe and act ongoingly
accordingly by way of evaginalization or ever sharing
whoreshipping and so commence our superstructures, in spirit and
in truth, which come to interlink, and so ever share and ever
whoreship. If the truth sets you free you shall be free indeed, in
Enough of this structure stuff. I’ll leave people
who love to play with the geometry to do so. Most won’t care.
Most just want as many as they like who quite like them to cater
to the many facets of their personalities and so love and make
love to God more through loving many as most honest normal people
will want all the mutually responsive foldmates they can handle to
make love as whoreship with. Now that they have understanding and
good ongoing committed purpose.
Remember, to commit to only
one is to repeatedly deny others. If everyone has many and there
is no doctrinal reason not to then no one has cause to be
However for those who still seek a conventional
relationship and for those who even seek the more primitive
concept of contractually binding, generally terminal, marriage, an
unscriptural control instrument of the lower realms costing many
heaps, they should at least have a renewable relationship
agreement, an RA, in place as with no relationship agreement in
place there is no commitment and only then for a term and upon
my RA site for RA and notes.
Is the foregoing not the
case and if not then why not?
The word tripartite
emphasizes situationally the three points and the word vertical
emphasizes that the apex is of a particular superior nature being
the source of love and the one overall that physically infills the
two at the base to make, give and receive love.
saying that you tip the triangle to have one human and one divine
at the base is a beautiful concept as then you are making love to
god (if a woman) or goddess, if a male. Like, making love to
angels. God comes down to earth and we worship God by making love
to an infilled believer, Heris creation fashioned for making love
as whoreship, literally infilled so they are ever keen to make
love. When we are vessels filled with God’s spirit of love to
make love (erections, enwettenments, extensionings tinglings) we
partake in the divine and we are in essence though on a base line
like God making love to the Goddess as we make love and we get to
partake and share.
Love and orgasm is a free gift from
God.dess and as a gift is to be orgasmically rendered back to God
by loving physically, committedly, our inti-mate neighbours we
vicariously love God.dess by making love by partaking of the
sexual spiritual sacraments, fucking and sucking, in our space
bodies we have here on earth, arbitrarily some male, some female,
for fun and pleasure, edification, fellowship and whoreship. And
as we accrue further foldmate believers who understand and believe
and love to make love with whomever they fancy who quite fancies
them our tripartite arrangements form lattices and we make more
friends and discover more foldmates to make love with love, time
permitting. Time is the only constraint.
If the tripartite
arrangements are forming into a lattice it would be hard to tip
one particular triangle so the apex of one human at the base goes
to the apex. The idea that we build our ever becoming circle
superstructure of triangles or means that we reach up by sharing,
whoreshipping, and outreach to add more to our circle by
evaginalizing with everyone ever moving away from the nadir but
still with one apex over all. Socrates’ example is illustrative
here to explain how the triangle accretion starts and does he not
use the discourse to evidence the existence of earlier life,
learning and immortality?
However as the lattice builds, a
human, who is a relative base in any tripartite arrangement may be
at a minor apex, and hence be seemingly ascended to a neophyte.
With all part of an overall lattice of triangles with an overall
apex, who is God.dess, and all knit, point and loop, together in
love so we, as lovers, in foldmateships are teacher lovers to some
and learner lovers in relation to those who are closer to the
central apex, but to move ahead we should simply “study to show
ourselves approved” and seek to love more and with more. It is a
wonderful design of ongoing foldmateships with multiple lovers in
a lattice which builds over time. Obviously logic demands and the
discourse of Socrates points towards this building of our triangle
based love circles being an eternal exercise of ever more love as
we move towards the infinite, which is God.dess.
So we have
a proof for God, do we not, and if not then why not?
we have a new covenant long proposed by God with his people where
we have God at the apex or centre and six other spokes per wheel
and you can have a number of wheels to get you to where you want
now many straights have been sucked in and blinded by iffy often
terminal, costly and oft regretted marriage, forlornly misled by
not being given proper teaching and led into a trap, in many cases
a dead end or a cul de sac which takes as long to get out of as
to get in, by those who should know better, if they know their
scriptures, or con artists and racketeers in the wedding promotion
industry who have something to gain by sucking the hapless in for
As I posit that marriage should be compulsory
for gays and banned outright for straights.
the procedures and the structures and gaining a knowledge of that
which has been withheld makes for greater understanding,
appreciation, belief, conviction and active sharing and loving.
The enquirer ever seeks to know more and should not be turned away
and should not be short changed by being told just to rely on
faith. The enquirer wants to know what and why and not be told,
for example, it is wrong to love a manageable number who likewise
believe and do similarly, in parallel, to love one other, not one
other, as Jesus, being of the God.dess of Love, loved in any way
He liked all the women (“Love one another, as I have loved you”,
as Mary M wrote in John’s gospel) of whom Mary M was the chief
leader, a High Priestess of sacramental Love of the temples of
Asherah etc. JC + MM, the double initiates, had their circles.
They are our sponsors.
Labelling the unnameable bespeaks
the infinite. Let’s abandon shibboleths.
It is natural
for us to want to reach out and build networks by coming together,
fucking together, point and loop, with those we like who quite
fancy us. We should not deny our and their God given desires for
love and lust. We should not dissemble. We should not
In deconstructing we are seeking to reassemble,
to build ourselves a mansion.
It is not a teaching for
everyone. You do not cast your pearls before swine. People qualify
themselves. Some primitive people have to go through the
unscriptural con of marriage so as to learn from being burned and
only then spurn, yearn and turn. Evolution of the soul, so to
speak. Some people have to learn the hard way so let them, if
that’s what they want.