on Wed, 20/02/2013 - 08:11
Submitted by anonymous user: [184.108.40.206]
Submitted values are:
Your Full Name: David Gregory Murphy
Your E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Correspondence for: The Governor-General
Subject: Some questions on notice re entitlement and details pertaining to claim - part 1
To Her Excellency: The Governor General of Australia
Dear Ms Quentin Bryce
1. I have several questions.
2. I understand the Governor General represents the Queen in Australia
but only by virtue that she has an uncontested claim to being monarch,
relying solely upon but genealogy alone to be a descendant of the Royal Line of
David, chosen of God.
3. If it emerged that someone, an Australian, based upon other
substantial and of divine origin compelling and unarguable circumstantial evidences
which had won admissions, had a superior claim to the Crown of the Royal line
of David as Messiah designate, King of Kings, whom we all know is destined
to come about now, upholdable in an applicable Court of Law, a case which
it would fall to you to run, would the Governor General represent that
Crown of the line of David or still the regional, and, it is contended, regent,
4. Where does the line of descent from King David and King David stand
in the role of the Governor General?
5. Who has precedence, the Queen of the House of Windsor, not seemingly
of direct descent of the line of King David or a divinely evidenced, and
admitted, scion of the Royal Line of David whom the said evidences (a
few below) and Court admissions attest to being Messiah, King of Kings,
should one emerge, as is now here in evidence before the Supreme Court?
6. Can you demonstrate that Queen Elizabeth is a direct descendant of
King David? Your website does not provide such substantiation.
7. What if God, who is no respecter of persons, decided that someone
other than Queen Elizabeth was the legitimate heir of the line of David (it
could very well happen, God, of course, knows who it really is (and so
seemingly do many others) and would provide attendant probative evidences open to
scrutiny) and evidence it with a manner of the fitting evidences in a
Court case and it was admitted to by all those is a position to say yea or
nay, including thrice by the regent Queen Elizabeth per the Rules of the
Supreme Court (UCPR) on 6th June, 4th July and 30th November 2012?
Instructions: 9.4.2013, 9 am.
Dear Governor General, Attorney Generals'
Departments, federal and state:
Please note Messiah David's website, cases, precedent matters and penalties, fees and announcements.
Please publicize appropriately that none may fall foul of the Messianic laws which apply in Australia as elsewhere.
Please ensure that all foreign Attorney Generals or equivalent departments worldwide are advised as these promulgations are universally binding.
Should there be any issue please advise.
David Gregory Murphy
To: email@example.com; Office of the Official
Secretary to the Governor-General; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Please publicize [SEC=Unclassified]
Sent: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:00:01 +1000
was read on Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:32:10 +1000
Your Please publicize
at: 09/04/2013 09:45:49 AM
Department of Attorney General and Justice - Promoting a Just and Safe Society.
Visit us at www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au.
Please consider our environment before printing this email. This email and any attachments may be confidential and contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this communication. If you have received this message in error please delete and notify the sender. When communicating by email you consent to the monitoring and recording of that correspondence.